Every year, there is over two hundred million innocent animals are injured or killed in scientific experiments across the world. Out of these animals, between seventeen and twenty million are used in the United States alone. It’s been known that an animal dies in a laboratory every three seconds. Those in favor of animal experimentation say they’re taking animals’ lives to save humans. But is it really necessary to subject animals to torturous conditions or painful experiments in the name of science? Is it right to destroy and take an animals’ life just by testing shampoos and makeup?
Animal experimentation, like many of the issues we face today, is difficult to argue against, and just as hard to support. Animal right activists are against using animals for medical research, but there seems to be some exceptions to this rule. For one, we do not experiment on humans without their consent. How do scientists get the animals consent? (Lin, Doris). Vast majority of experiments using animals are so invasive and injurious, they could never consider allowing humans to even consent to these types of experiments being used on animals.
Some people question, if ending vivisection would medical progress end? The answer would be no, because non-animal testing would still be done. Since there are so many medical issues that go unexplored because of lack of resources that if they would take the resources used in animal research and redirected it towards non-animal research the medical progress would continue. (“Why is it wrong to test on animals). Unfortunately in animal testing, there are many animals that are tested for substances that will never see approval or public consumption and use.
Thus, leaving animals dyeing in vain because no direct benefit. (Using Animals for Testing Pros versus Cons). There has to be a better way of testing then to measure how long it takes a chemical to burn away the cornea of a rabbit’s eye. (Cosmetic and household products). There are several medical advances that were made without animal testing. For example, in the 18th century, the first vaccine was invented without using animal experimentation; it was used for cowpox in order to build a resistance to smallpox. Also, Penicillin was another drug that was iscovered without using animals. (Why is it wrong to test on animals? ) Some other ways of preventing this harsh experiments on animals are, cell culture, computer simulation and scanning techniques. Cell culture is a form of testing is an alternative to the use of animals. In this testing, tests are conducted for chemical absorption by skin, skin corrosion, etc. Computer stimulation is where they use crash test dummies/computer operated mannequins. In this test, the use of pigs has been replaced with these dummies.
And the last one is scanning techniques, which is like a MRI. Thus using this method, it provides in depth information on human scans, which helps determine health problems without using animals. (Alternatives to animal testing). Luckily today there are several cruelty-free cosmetics and household products that are not tested on animals. There are several things that consumers can do; by people boycotting animal tested products help push companies and government agencies to use the more humane non-animal methods.
Also, write and tell companies why you won’t apply their eye shadow, detergents, or washing your child’s hair with their shampoo. This will slowly help but will be great thing in the long run. Since there are so many ways of doing research without testing on animals. Because not all products used on animals even work on their experiments, so animals die and suffer for no reason. ( Cosmetic and Household Products)
1. Lin, Doris “Why It’s Wrong to Test on Animals” Vivisection and Animal Rights About. com Guide http://animalrights. about. om/od/vivisection/a/VivisectionFAQ. htm 2. Murnaghan, Ian “Using Animals for Testing Pros versus Cons” 1, July 2011 Web http://www. aboutanimaltesting. co. uk/using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons. html 3. Nakate, Shashank “ Alternatives to Animal Testing. ” Buzzle Last Updated: 9/28/2011 http://www. buzzle. com/articles/alternatives-to-animal-testing. html 4. “Cosmetics and Household Products Animal Testing” PETA. 25 Sept 2001. Web. 2 Oct. 2010. http://www. peta. org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/cosmetic-household-products-animal-testing. aspx